Not The Only One

Does the church of Christ consider itself "the only church"? Do you really believe that you are the only one's going to heaven? Let's examine some areas in which the church "is not the only one."

We are not the only ones who respect the Bible as God's Book.

It is true that many do not believe the Bible is inspired. They reject the Creation story and the miracles. Some religionists are surprised, when pressure is exerted, to learn that their own preachers deny the inspiration of the Bible.

We make no apology for believing that the inspired writers gave us what God intended them to write. We know that the apostles believed that the words they were writing came from God. This is one of the basic beliefs of the church of Christ. However. . .there are other groups who do believe the Bible, so we are not "the only ones." Evolution and humanism are being opposed by conservative preachers in some denominations. Some are trying to oust the modernists from their theological schools and are leading fights in the creation/evolution battles, so this point alone is not what makes us different.

We are not the only ones who recognize distinctions between the Old Testament and the New Testament.

What is that distinction?

God promised a new covenant. The New Testament reveals that it has come, John 1:17 - "For the Law was given through Moses; grace and truth were realized through Jesus Christ."

We must still study the O.T. and learn from its examples but we look to Christ in the New Testament for Salvation.

We are not "the only ones" who understand this, however.

Look at the percentage of other religious groups who meet on the first day of the week rather than the Sabbath day for worship and who reject animal sacrifices, polygamy, incense, Passover, etc. There are some others who apparently have believed Col. 2:14 which says, "Having canceled out the certificate of debt consisting of degrees against us and which was hostile to us; And he has taken it out of the way, having nailed it to the cross."

We are not the only ones who worship without the use of instruments of music.

True, this does make us different. But there is a basic reason for it, every passage in the New Testament referring to church music identifies it as a capella, which is a Latin term meaning, "as in church." In all the Bible there are only nine verses that speak about church music.

The reason we do not use instruments of music in our worship is that they were not used by the apostles, they were not used by the New Testament church, and they were not used by the church for several hundred years after it was established.

To make such an addition is to presume what God desires, and man has no right to presume what God desires, he must obey what he has revealed. The fact that instruments were available, but were left out of the New Testament worship holds a significance often overlooked. Old Testament sacrifices and worship involved outward ceremony that became routine. It ceased to be from the heart. A child of God was such by birth, not conviction. He had to be taught who God was. Their worship opportunities became chores and duties that they did not put themselves into (Malachi 1:7-14). Worship became a burden to them.

As a Christian, one learns of God and loves him before becoming his child (see again Jeremiah 31:31ff), his worship is to be from the heart, his life is a sacrifice, and instead of some mechanical substitute, the Christian, by singing, gives of himself in worship. However. . .we are not the only ones who reject the instrument. Throughout history there have been groups that have realized the importance of worship according to the New Testament design, rather than according to the traditions of men.

We are not the only ones who include in worship the Lord's Supper on a weekly basis.

Why do we do this? Jesus instituted the Lord's Supper and placed it in the church for regular observance; Paul said in I Cor. 11 that he delivered to them what he had received of the Lord so that "as often" as they observed it, they could show his death until he comes again. As a memorial the Lord's Supper has beauty and purpose. It provides an opening to teach small children as they grow up.

Some say that the Lord's supper was not taken on a weekly basis by the church in the N.T. but Scriptures reveal that it was, Acts 20:7 - "and on the first day of the week, when we were gathered together to break bread. . ." The terminology we use identifies frequency. If I say my birthday is March 1st, you do not ask, "Which March 1st?" March 1st pinpoints it as a yearly event since each year has a March 1st. If your boss were to tell you that you were to be paid on the 1st & 15th, you would not say "which month?" Each week has a first day, and it was known that the disciples came together on that day to break bread. However. . .there are other religious groups that observe something which they regard as the Lord's Supper on a weekly basis, so at least, on this point, we are not the only ones.

We are not the only ones who teach and practice the matter of baptism as we do.

We stress that baptism should be immersion, because that's the definition of the original Greek word, and passages like:

However. . .we all know of some other religious groups that also teach that baptism is by immersion rather than sprinkling or pouring. We teach that baptism should be "for the forgiveness of sins (or the remission of sins) because of passages like:

Baptism is essential to salvation, as the Bible clearly demonstrates. There are some other religious groups who teach and practice baptism as essential for salvation, so we are not "the only ones" who at least include it as a command from God that stands between the accountable sinner and salvation.

To save time, let me illustrate this matter further, but more rapidly.

To summarize:

These nine examples are enough to illustrate the point: We are not "the only ones" involved in these key points of practice identified in the Scriptures.

Is there any sense in which the church of Christ is different? Any sense in which it is truly "the only one?" Even though in each case we have studied there are some other religious groups who teach and practice the same basic things we have studied, there is one big difference:

IT IS ONLY IN THE CHURCH OF CHRIST THAT ONE MAY BELIEVE AND PRACTICE ALL OF THESE THINGS AT THE SAME TIME!

Let me illustrate. You may find that church "A" believes in baptism by immersion, but does not baptize for the remission of sins; church "B" may baptize for the remission of sins, but does not worship without adding instruments; church "C" may wear a Scriptural name, but does not take the Lord's Supper each week, and so on.

Other churches may have a mixture of one or two of these cardinal matters of faith and practice, but omit the rest. You may find a dozen groups practicing tid-bits of truth, but who do you find besides the church of Christ making the plea that we get back to the Bible on all points of doctrine at the same time?

The plea of the restoration movement is that we be Christians, and Christians only, that we speak where the Bible speaks, and be silent where the Bible is silent, that we return completely to the New Testament for our authority in matters of faith and practice. That we speak the Truth, and nothing but the Truth (John 17:17). We do not apologize for saying, "We must follow God and not Man." Our plea to all is that we all unite under the unity of the Scriptures. When this is done, human traditions will fade into insignificance.

This article adapted by permission from What Do the Scriptures Say? provided by the Mt Vernon Church of Christ and Mike Scott, minister.
Copyright 1998-2002 Mike Scott

Main Navigation

Home
About This Site
Bible Search
Site Comments
Search Options

Site Features

Greatest Love Story
God's Plan of Salvation
Just A Christian